Frederick Douglass’s Slave Narrative Authenticity Essay

ROUGH DRAFT Storytelling has always been prominent among the human tend ever since the oral tradition was schematic and the first written actors line came to be. It is not uncommon for a person to share their experiences, feelings, and thoughts through literature. The grimness of these accounts often are not questioned. In 1845, Frederick Douglass publish his narration, Narrative of the heart of Frederick Douglass, an American knuckle down.Through theme and word of mouth, Douglass achieved international fame. Despite all of this, the grimness of the slave memoir genre has come into question. Skeptics and naysayers claim that this genre of writing is fantasized, and use Olaudah Equianos narrative as a prime example. Although The evoke Narrative of the career of Olaudah Equiano has questionable history validity Douglass writings father been affirmed by William Lloyd fortress, a prominent American abolitionist, in the preface.It has similarly been published and categoris ed as an autobiography. Accordingly, it is established that Douglass writing is non-fiction, therefore, it mustiness be authentic. Being that the narrative was prefaced by William Lloyd Garrison, an exceptionally outspoken anti-slavery advocate, and author of William Lloyd Garrison and the Fight against Slavery, it would be almost impossible to claim that Frederick Douglass claims were falsified.Garrison indited, I am confident that is it essentially true in all its statements that secret code has been stigmatize down in malice, nothing exaggerated, nothing drawn from imagination that it comes piffling of the reality, rather than overstates a single fact in regard to thraldom AS IT IS which conveys that he had complete and total trust towards Douglass (Which is a well behaved display of character on Douglass behalf). Therefore, William Lloyd Garrisons regard for Frederick Douglass does nothing but further prove the believability of Douglass auto-biography.The authenticity of N arrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave is also substantiated by the writing being categorized as an autobiography. As things go, auto-biographies are considered to be non-fiction. If Douglass writings were untrue, it would be relatively easy to disprove his written accounts because of all of the factual information take in order to produce an autobiography. Frederick Douglass is also credited with the writing of his routine autobiography, My Bondage and MyFreedom(1855), and his third, The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass(1881). The print is comprised of detailed experiences, places, people, and events that are historically accurate. Because of this, Douglass experiences are considered to be factual information. By the same token, Frederick Douglass first autobiography was also a published work. Douglass Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave went through the process of publication in 1845, and was ultimately published by the Amer ican Anti-Slavery Society.In order to publish a non-fictional piece of literature, the piece must benon-fictional. In the best interest of authors and publishers alike it would be comic to compose and publish a fictional text and write it moody as a work of non-fiction. Considering that the memoir received publication status, it is established that the publisher did not see it as a risk to their well-behaved name, and that Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave is authentic. In essence, Frederick Douglass piece is undoubtedly unbiased, authentic, and legitimate.The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave was not only published & categorized as an autobiography, but it was also endorsed by a high-principled source, William Lloyd Garrison. Many Caucasian autobiographies of the 17th-18th century are not besieged with criticism, such as Daniel Defoes catch Ross The Life and Adventures of Mrs. Christian Davies, Commonly Called Mother R oss, on Campaign with the Duke of Marlborough(1740). It could be possible that the criticism of the slave narrative genre is truly a form of discrimination, rather than genuine mistrust.