.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Evaluating a Website for Credibility Essay

A search for manpowers health tie in website conducted exploitation the state-supported search engine Google.com. Mens wellness Network (MHN), http//www.menshealthnetwork.org, is a nonprofit organization reaching out to males and their families focussing on the growing health crisis that affect the premature mortality of men (Mens health Network, 2014). Approximately 50% of the population is male evaluating the sites believability is important when using it as an educational bill for male patients relate to prevention and management of health.Evaluation of websiteMHN is comprised of spokespersons and advisory board. The website discloses a limited itemisation of spokespersons with title and argonas of educational focus. The site states, there are over 800 physicians, mental health experts, and other key thought leaders among the MHN Board of Advisors (Mens Health Network, 2014). The readability of the website is not technical, the average person will be suitable to read th e randomness on the site and be able to understand the intent of the organizations message. The information that is presented is accurate but referencing to studies and citations are abstracted or difficult to find. Brief explanations of diseases are summarized followed by nexuss to distant sources such as the American Urology Association, National Institute of Health, or Journal of Mens Health for additional information.MHN is sponsored by pecuniary donations from the creation as well as internships to promote education to the public and policy makers related to mens health (Mens Health Network, 2014). Partnerships are publicly demonstration at the bottom of the website and range from for-profit dose companies such as Glaxo Smith Kline, Bayer and Pfizer as well as nonprofit organizations such as Boy Scouts of America and Veterans Health Council. Since the subjugate of for-profit partnerships with MHN supersedes thenonprofit partnerships, one can view the information provided on MHN as favoring the for profit companies despite MHN having involvements to outside sources for information on diseases.MHN website piloting is user friendly with headings at the top of the web pages that are akin on every page. The font utilized is clear, easy to read, and not energetic on the eyes. All cogitate in headings are operational and link phrases are clearly described to target page. MHN security link states cargo to ensuring user retirement and that any information collected is used sole(prenominal) in accordance to the November 2012 policy (Mens Health Network, 2014). MHN informs that the website will prayer permission to place cookys on users computer.The term cookie is defined and gives the user informed consent. MHN clearly states that clicking links to partnerships and outside sources link takes the user away from MHN site and states, we cannot be responsible for the protection and privacy of any information which you provide whilst visiting such sites and such sites are not governed by this privacy statement. (Mens Health Network, 2014).Empirical raiseBuilding credibility for a website requires providing links to reputable organizations which increase traffic, thereby increasing its relevance in search outcomes (Calabro, 2010). MHN achieves this with a banner containing links to other organizations for the reader to get additional information, but the sites that the reader is link to do not always reciprocate a link back. Calabro (2010) suggests that modify the home page regularly with updated graphics, information, and testimonials are vital to enhancing the websites presence on the internet. MHN, compared to www.nih.org which publicly displays the sites last revision, information contained on the site doesnt display last revision although there is updating to the site by march of seminar announcements, online flyers, and press releases. In a study of 1,442 acute care nurses active in one large hospital system with readily open library sources, 43% reported starting a search with Google.Of that radical 64% reported success in obtaining results using a ecumenical search engine such as Google. While 49% started a search using CINAHL or MEDLINE, a much smaller pct reported successful searching (20% and 24% respectively) of these professional databases. (Miller, Graves, Jones, & Sievert, 2010, p. 3) Not having a subscription to CINAHL orMEDLINE, according to (Miller et al., 2010), should not hinder knowledgeable nurses in using public search engines for credible information as a tool to educate patients and families.Application to nurse practiceEvaluating information found on the internet is important to properly educate patients as MHN provides educational literal for men, boys, women and families. The professional nurse can utilize the site resources to aide families to get out with ailments that affect their male loved ones. Nurses can resource MHN to provide information to families to co-pay car d programs to curb the high cost of health insurance.SummaryMHN demonstrates credibility by the use of expert advising board and links to creditable organizations which devote done studies to support their mission. The site is easy to find on public search engines, easy to read for the lay person while grown links to more detailed information for the healthcare professional.ReferencesCalabro A 2010 Endhave your presensce on the internet with an modify website.Calabro, A. (2010). Enhance your presence on the internet with an improved website. O&P Business News, 19(12), 18. 201409201149291993026019 Mens Health NetworkMens Health Network. (n.d.). Retrieved folk 15, 2014, from http//www.menshealthnetwork.org 201409161816071882827044 Miller L C Graves R S Jones B B Sievert M C 2010 Beyond Google Finding and evaluating web-based information for community-based nursing practice.Miller, L. C., Graves, R. S., Jones, B. B., & Sievert, M. C. (2010). Beyond Google Finding and evaluating web -based information for community-based nursing practice. International Journal of breast feeding Education Scholarship, 7(1), 1-16. doi10.2202/1548-923X.1961 201409201214161550333619

No comments:

Post a Comment